DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Cadillac ATS vs 2014 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeVolvo
ATSModelS60
2013Model year2014
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,6 s
0 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
205 HPPower215 HP
259 NmTorque440 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank67 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 Hydra-MaticGears6
225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4635 mm
1805 mmWidth1899 mm
1421 mmHeight1484 mm
1505 KgWeight1680 Kg
2775 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Cadillac ATS and 2014 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…