2014 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.4 D5 (215 Hp) 2014Overall Score76.75/100
2014 Volvo S60 vs 2013 Cadillac ATS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Cadillac
ATS
Cadillac ATS 2.5 (205 Hp) 2013Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
76.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac ATS
VolvoMakeCadillac
S60ModelATS
2014Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac ATS
7,6 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
215 HPPower205 HP
440 NmTorque259 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac ATS
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac ATS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6 Hydra-Matic
—Tyre size225/45 R17; 225/40 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac ATS
4635 mmLength4643 mm
1899 mmWidth1805 mm
1484 mmHeight1421 mm
1680 KgWeight1505 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2775 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Volvo S60 and 2013 Cadillac ATS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…