2003 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.4 20V (210 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.75/100
2003 Volvo S60 vs 2003 Cadillac CTS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Cadillac
CTS
Cadillac CTS 2.6i V6 24V L (181 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac CTS
VolvoMakeCadillac
S60ModelCTS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac CTS
7,6 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
230 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2597 cc
210 HPPower181 HP
320 NmTorque245 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac CTS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac CTS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationCadillac CTS
4576 mmLength4828 mm
1804 mmWidth1795 mm
1428 mmHeight1441 mm
1475 KgWeight1625 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volvo S60 and 2003 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…