DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jaguar X-type vs 2003 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
X-typeModelS60
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
225 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
196 HPPower210 HP
241 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4672 mmLength4576 mm
1789 mmWidth1804 mm
1430 mmHeight1428 mm
1570 KgWeight1475 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jaguar X-type and 2003 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…