2002 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.4 (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
2002 Volvo S60 vs 2002 Honda CR-V Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Honda
CR-V
Honda CR-V 2.4 i 16V LX (162 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Honda CR-V
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationHonda CR-V
VolvoMakeHonda
S60ModelCR-V
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationHonda CR-V
8,1 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2354 cc
200 HPPower162 HP
285 NmTorque220 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationHonda CR-V
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
15 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationHonda CR-V
4576 mmLength4536 mm
1804 mmWidth1783 mm
1428 mmHeight1682 mm
1440 KgWeight1505 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Volvo S60 and 2002 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…