DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo S60 vs 2013 Honda CR-Z Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S60SpecificationHonda CR-Z
VolvoMakeHonda
S60ModelCR-Z
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

Volvo S60SpecificationHonda CR-Z
12,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
115 HPPower114 HP
270 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S60SpecificationHonda CR-Z
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank40 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S60SpecificationHonda CR-Z
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S60SpecificationHonda CR-Z
4635 mmLength4078 mm
1899 mmWidth2013 mm
1484 mmHeight1395 mm
1635 KgWeight1147 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2435 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo S60 and 2013 Honda CR-Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…