DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Honda FIT vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
HondaMakeVolvo
FITModelS60
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
134 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
32 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption4,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
3955 mmLength4635 mm
1695 mmWidth1899 mm
1525 mmHeight1484 mm
1080 KgWeight1635 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Honda FIT and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…