2006 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.4 20V (140 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.5/100
2006 Volvo S40 vs 2006 Kia Carnival Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Kia
Carnival
Kia Carnival 2.5i V6 24V (150 Hp) 2006Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Kia Carnival
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationKia Carnival
VolvoMakeKia
S40ModelCarnival
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationKia Carnival
10,6 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
220 NmTorque224 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationKia Carnival
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationKia Carnival
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16 VTyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationKia Carnival
4476 mmLength4925 mm
1770 mmWidth1900 mm
1454 mmHeight1735 mm
1400 KgWeight1915 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2905 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Volvo S40 and 2006 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…