DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Kia Carnival vs 2006 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
CarnivalModelS40
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
224 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4476 mm
1900 mmWidth1770 mm
1735 mmHeight1454 mm
1915 KgWeight1400 Kg
2905 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Kia Carnival and 2006 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…