DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Serena vs 2004 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Serena

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
SerenaModelS40
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
170 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
280 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption13,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4476 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1830 mmHeight1454 mm
1720 KgWeight1400 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Serena and 2004 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Serena leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…