2004 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.4 20V (140 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
2004 Volvo S40 vs 2005 Jeep Wrangler Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 2.4 i 16V (147 Hp) 2005Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
VolvoMakeJeep
S40ModelWrangler
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
10,6 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
200 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
140 HPPower147 HP
220 NmTorque224 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank57 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16 VTyre size215/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
4476 mmLength3883 mm
1770 mmWidth1694 mm
1454 mmHeight1750 mm
1400 KgWeight1605 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2373 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo S40 and 2005 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…