DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 5 vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S40
MazdaMakeVolvo
5ModelS40
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S40
13,1 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
186 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
144 HPPower145 HP
180 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S40
4585 mmLength4476 mm
1750 mmWidth1770 mm
1615 mmHeight1454 mm
1450 KgWeight1360 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 5 and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…