DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationSaab 9-3
VolvoMakeSaab
S40Model9-3
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationSaab 9-3
8,7 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
177 HPPower175 HP
400 NmTorque265 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationSaab 9-3
4476 mmLength4635 mm
1770 mmWidth1762 mm
1454 mmHeight1466 mm
1498 KgWeight1440 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…