2012 • Volkswagen
Amarok
Volkswagen Amarok 2.0 TDI (180 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Volkswagen Amarok vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0 D4 (177 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Amarok
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen AmarokSpecificationVolvo S40
VolkswagenMakeVolvo
AmarokModelS40
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volkswagen AmarokSpecificationVolvo S40
10,3-10.7 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower177 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen AmarokSpecificationVolvo S40
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volkswagen AmarokSpecificationVolvo S40
5254 mmLength4476 mm
1944 mmWidth1770 mm
1834 mmHeight1454 mm
1905 KgWeight1498 Kg
3095 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volkswagen Amarok and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Amarok leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…