DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo S40 vs 2002 Saturn SC Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SC

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationSaturn SC
VolvoMakeSaturn
S40ModelSC
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationSaturn SC
10,5 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
200 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
122 HPPower126 HP
174 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationSaturn SC
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationSaturn SC
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationSaturn SC
4516 mmLength4575 mm
1716 mmWidth1709 mm
1422 mmHeight1326 mm
1230 KgWeight1415 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo S40 and 2002 Saturn SC approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SC leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…