DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo S40
MazdaMakeVolvo
323ModelS40
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo S40
9,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
194 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
114 HPPower122 HP
161 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo S40
4315 mmLength4516 mm
1705 mmWidth1716 mm
1410 mmHeight1422 mm
1125 KgWeight1230 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…