DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Megane vs 1996 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
MeganeModelS40
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
183 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1731 cc
98 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4483 mm
1699 mmWidth1717 mm
1420 mmHeight1411 mm
1135 KgWeight1286 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Megane and 1996 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…