1996 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.8 16V (115 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
1996 Volvo S40 vs 1996 Honda Sm-x Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Honda
Sm-x
Honda Sm-x 2.0 i 16V (131 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
VolvoMakeHonda
S40ModelSm-x
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
10,5 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1731 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
115 HPPower131 HP
165 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
12 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
4483 mmLength3950 mm
1717 mmWidth1695 mm
1411 mmHeight1750 mm
1286 KgWeight1330 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo S40 and 1996 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…