2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6i (101 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Skoda Roomster Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Skoda
Roomster
Skoda Roomster 1.6 TDI (90 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationSkoda Roomster
VolvoMakeSkoda
S40ModelRoomster
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationSkoda Roomster
11,9 s0–100 km/h13,3 s
185 km/hTop speed171 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationSkoda Roomster
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationSkoda Roomster
4468 mmLength4214 mm
1770 mmWidth1684 mm
1452 mmHeight1607 mm
1235 KgWeight1322 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Skoda Roomster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…