DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 2 vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
MazdaMakeVolvo
2ModelS40
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
175 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
95 HPPower101 HP
205 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
3920 mmLength4468 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1475 mmHeight1452 mm
1025 KgWeight1235 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 2 and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…