2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6i (101 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Mini Clubman Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mini
Clubman
Mini Clubman 1.6 (90 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
VolvoMakeMini
S40ModelClubman
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
11,9 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
185 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption3,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
4468 mmLength3961 mm
1770 mmWidth1683 mm
1452 mmHeight1426 mm
1235 KgWeight1185 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2547 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Mini Clubman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…