DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 2
VolvoMakeMazda
S40Model2
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 2
11,9 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
185 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
101 HPPower95 HP
150 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank43 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 2
4468 mmLength3920 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1452 mmHeight1475 mm
1235 KgWeight1025 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…