DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Kia Ceed Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationKia Ceed
VolvoMakeKia
S40ModelCeed
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationKia Ceed
11,9 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
185 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1582 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationKia Ceed
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank53 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationKia Ceed
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationKia Ceed
4468 mmLength4470 mm
1770 mmWidth1790 mm
1452 mmHeight1525 mm
1235 KgWeight1419 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Kia Ceed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…