DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C4
VolvoMakeCitroen
S40ModelC4
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C4
11,9 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
101 HPPower92 HP
150 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C4
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption4,8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption4,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C4
4468 mmLength4329 mm
1770 mmWidth1789 mm
1452 mmHeight1489-1502 mm
1235 KgWeight1205 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…