2012 • Mini
Countryman
Mini Countryman 1.6 (98 Hp) 2012Overall Score53.25/100
2012 Mini Countryman vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6i (100 Hp) 2012Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
53.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo S40
MiniMakeVolvo
CountrymanModelS40
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4/5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo S40
11,9 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
153 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16 92HTyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo S40
4097 mmLength4476 mm
1789 mmWidth1770 mm
1561 mmHeight1454 mm
1265 KgWeight1311 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mini Countryman and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…