2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6i (100 Hp) 2012Overall Score53.5/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Mini Clubman Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mini
Clubman
Mini Clubman 1.6 (98 Hp) 2012Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
VolvoMakeMini
S40ModelClubman
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
11,9 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
150 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationMini Clubman
4476 mmLength3937 mm
1770 mmWidth1683 mm
1454 mmHeight1426 mm
1311 KgWeight1140 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2547 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Mini Clubman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…