DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 3
VolvoMakeMazda
S40Model3
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 3
11,9 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
150 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 3
4476 mmLength4460 mm
1770 mmWidth1755 mm
1454 mmHeight1470 mm
1311 KgWeight1195 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…