2000 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6 16V (109 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
2000 Volvo S40 vs 2000 Citroen Xsara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Xsara
VolvoMakeCitroen
S40ModelXsara
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Xsara
12,0 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
190 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
109 HPPower101 HP
145 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Xsara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank54 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/55R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Xsara
4516 mmLength4167 mm
1716 mmWidth1698 mm
1422 mmHeight1405 mm
1255 KgWeight1070 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volvo S40 and 2000 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…