2000 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Citroen Xsara vs 2000 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6 16V (109 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationVolvo S40
CitroenMakeVolvo
XsaraModelS40
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationVolvo S40
15,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
177 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
101 HPPower109 HP
153 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/55R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationVolvo S40
4167 mmLength4516 mm
1698 mmWidth1716 mm
1405 mmHeight1422 mm
1070 KgWeight1255 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2562 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Citroen Xsara and 2000 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…