DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Volvo C70 vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-3
VolvoMakeSaab
C70Model9-3
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-3
6,9 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2319 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
240 HPPower230 HP
330 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-3
4720 mmLength4629 mm
1820 mmWidth1711 mm
1410 mmHeight1428 mm
1500 KgWeight1380 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Volvo C70 and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…