DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saab 9-3 vs 1999 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C70
SaabMakeVolvo
9-3ModelC70
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
3/5Doors2

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C70
6,8 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2319 cc
230 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption10,0 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/45 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C70
4629 mmLength4720 mm
1711 mmWidth1820 mm
1428 mmHeight1410 mm
1380 KgWeight1500 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saab 9-3 and 1999 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…