DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo C70 vs 2004 Saab 9-2X Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-2X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-2X
VolvoMakeSaab
C70Model9-2X
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-2X
7,9 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed227 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
225 HPPower230 HP
310 NmTorque294 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-2X
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-2X
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C70SpecificationSaab 9-2X
4720 mmLength4460 mm
1820 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1465 mm
1570 KgWeight1445 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo C70 and 2004 Saab 9-2X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-2X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…