DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Audi TT vs 2005 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo C70
AudiMakeVolvo
TTModelC70
2004Model year2005
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo C70
6,6 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
243 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
225 HPPower225 HP
280 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo C70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption16,4 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo C70
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo C70
4041 mmLength4720 mm
1764 mmWidth1820 mm
1345 mmHeight1410 mm
1465 KgWeight1570 Kg
2429 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Audi TT and 2005 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…