2003 • Volvo
C70
Volvo C70 2.0 20V (180 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Volvo C70 vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Volvo C70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C70SpecificationFord C-Max
VolvoMakeFord
C70ModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeMPV
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Volvo C70SpecificationFord C-Max
9,3 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
220 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
180 HPPower136 HP
220 NmTorque320 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C70SpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C70SpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C70SpecificationFord C-Max
4720 mmLength4330 mm
1820 mmWidth1820 mm
1410 mmHeight1600 mm
1570 KgWeight1391 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volvo C70 and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…