DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo C70
FordMakeVolvo
C-MaxModelC70
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo C70
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
136 HPPower180 HP
320 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo C70
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption16,3 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo C70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo C70
4330 mmLength4720 mm
1820 mmWidth1820 mm
1600 mmHeight1410 mm
1391 KgWeight1570 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…