DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Buick Regal vs 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeOldsmobile
RegalModelCutlass
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3340 cc
208 HPPower162 HP
312 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank51 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption15 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears—
205/70 R15Tyre size185/75 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4555 mm
1842 mmWidth1700 mm
1354 mmHeight1330 mm
1491 KgWeight1200 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Buick Regal and 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…