DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1990 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeBuick
CutlassModelRegal
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3340 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
162 HPPower208 HP
251 NmTorque312 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank64 lt
15 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4 Hydramatic
185/75 R14Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4925 mm
1700 mmWidth1842 mm
1330 mmHeight1354 mm
1200 KgWeight1491 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1990 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…