2008 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V (170 Hp) 2008Overall Score68.5/100
2008 Volvo C30 vs 2008 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2008Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Volvo C30
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
VolvoMakeFord
C30ModelRanger
2008Model year2008
CoupeBody typePick-up
4Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
8,1 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
170 HPPower143 HP
230 NmTorque330 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
4252 mmLength5075 mm
1782 mmWidth1805 mm
1447 mmHeight1745 mm
1429 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Volvo C30 and 2008 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…