DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Citroen C6 vs 2008 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C6SpecificationVolvo C30
CitroenMakeVolvo
C6ModelC30
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

Citroen C6SpecificationVolvo C30
10,3 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
217 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
370 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C6SpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C6SpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/55 R17; 245/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C6SpecificationVolvo C30
4908 mmLength4252 mm
1860 mmWidth1782 mm
1464 mmHeight1447 mm
1821 KgWeight1429 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Citroen C6 and 2008 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…