2010 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.4 D5 (163 Hp) 2010Overall Score70.75/100
2010 Volvo C30 vs 2010 Buick Regal Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 2.4 (200 Hp) 2010Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Buick Regal
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationBuick Regal
VolvoMakeBuick
C30ModelRegal
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationBuick Regal
9,3 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
210 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
163 HPPower200 HP
340 NmTorque280 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationBuick Regal
DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
60 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationBuick Regal
4252 mmLength4831 mm
1782 mmWidth1857 mm
1447 mmHeight1483 mm
1404 KgWeight1641 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2738 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Volvo C30 and 2010 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…