DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Buick Regal vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeVolvo
RegalModelC30
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
226 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
200 HPPower163 HP
280 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
59 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4831 mmLength4252 mm
1857 mmWidth1782 mm
1483 mmHeight1447 mm
1641 KgWeight1404 Kg
2738 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Buick Regal and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…