DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo C30 vs 2008 Mazda MX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
VolvoMakeMazda
C30ModelMX-5
2008Model year2008
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
9,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
163 HPPower167 HP
340 NmTorque190 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,9 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size"205/45 ZR17 84 W "
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
4252 mmLength3995 mm
1782 mmWidth1720 mm
1447 mmHeight1245 mm
1404 KgWeight1146 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo C30 and 2008 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…