DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Mazda MX-5 vs 2008 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
MazdaMakeVolvo
MX-5ModelC30
2008Model year2008
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
—0–100 km/h9,3 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
167 HPPower163 HP
190 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
"205/45 ZR17 84 W "Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
3995 mmLength4252 mm
1720 mmWidth1782 mm
1245 mmHeight1447 mm
1146 KgWeight1404 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Mazda MX-5 and 2008 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…