DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo C30 vs 2008 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeJaguar
C30ModelX-type
2008Model year2008
CoupeBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
210 km/hTop speed207 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2099 cc
163 HPPower156 HP
340 NmTorque196 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4252 mmLength4716 mm
1782 mmWidth1789 mm
1447 mmHeight1483 mm
1404 KgWeight1515 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo C30 and 2008 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…