DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo C30 vs 2009 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationBMW X3
VolvoMakeBMW
C30ModelX3
2009Model year2009
CoupeBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationBMW X3
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
136 HPPower143 HP
320 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationBMW X3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank67 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationBMW X3
4252 mmLength4569 mm
1782 mmWidth1853 mm
1447 mmHeight1674 mm
1421 KgWeight1740 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo C30 and 2009 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…