E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 BMW X3 vs 2009 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelC30
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
10,3 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower136 HP
350 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank52 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
4569 mmLength4252 mm
1853 mmWidth1782 mm
1674 mmHeight1447 mm
1740 KgWeight1421 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 BMW X3 and 2009 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2009 Mazda 3VS2009 BMW X3Mazda 3 vs BMW X32009 and 2009 model years2009 Seat ExeoVS2009 BMW X3Seat Exeo vs BMW X32009 and 2009 model years2009 Citroen C4VS2009 BMW X3Citroen C4 vs BMW X32009 and 2009 model years2009 Ford MondeoVS2009 BMW X3Ford Mondeo vs BMW X32009 and 2009 model years2009 Mitsubishi OutlanderVS2009 BMW X3Mitsubishi Outlander vs BMW X32009 and 2009 model years

Comments are loading…