2011 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D4 (177 Hp) 2011Overall Score67.75/100
2011 Volvo C30 vs 2011 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.4 CVVT (180 Hp) 2011Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationKia Optima
VolvoMakeKia
C30ModelOptima
2011Model year2011
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationKia Optima
8,6 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
177 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque231 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationKia Optima
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationKia Optima
4266 mmLength4845 mm
1782 mmWidth1830 mm
1447 mmHeight1455 mm
1451 KgWeight1428 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2795 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Volvo C30 and 2011 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…