DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volkswagen Amarok vs 2011 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Amarok

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
AmarokModelC30
2011Model year2011
Pick-upBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

10,3-10.7 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower177 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5254 mmLength4266 mm
1944 mmWidth1782 mm
1834 mmHeight1447 mm
1905 KgWeight1451 Kg
3095 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volkswagen Amarok and 2011 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Amarok leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…