2012 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Toyota Wish Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Toyota
Wish
Toyota Wish 2.0i (152 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Wish
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationToyota Wish
VolvoMakeToyota
C30ModelWish
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeMinivan
5Seats6
3Doors5
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationToyota Wish
9,4 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1986 cc
150 HPPower152 HP
350 NmTorque193 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationToyota Wish
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationToyota Wish
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6GearsCVT-i
—Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationToyota Wish
4266 mmLength4600 mm
1782 mmWidth1745 mm
1447 mmHeight1600 mm
1450 KgWeight1430 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Toyota Wish approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Wish leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…