2012 • Nissan
X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail 2.0 dCi (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
2012 Nissan X-Trail vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Nissan X-Trail
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo C30
NissanMakeVolvo
X-TrailModelC30
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo C30
11,2 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo C30
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/60 R17; 225/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan X-TrailSpecificationVolvo C30
4635 mmLength4266 mm
1790 mmWidth1782 mm
1700 mmHeight1447 mm
1605 KgWeight1450 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Nissan X-Trail and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…